<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEEDROUND: Where It All Starts &#187; Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seedround.com/category/branding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seedround.com</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Startup Life and the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Naming Boxxet</title>
		<link>http://seedround.com/naming-boxxet</link>
		<comments>http://seedround.com/naming-boxxet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>You Mon Tsang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biz360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxxet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seedround.com/naming-boxxet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far, naming the company was one of the hardest things we did. I enjoy the process very much. I&#8217;ve done it before. Iâ€™ve read a pretty good book (Wordcraft, by Alex Frankel); Iâ€™ve thought hard about them. For tech companies, the big problem is, of course, URL availability and it is an extreme limiting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, naming the company was one of the hardest things we did.</p>
<p>I enjoy the process very much. I&#8217;ve done it before. Iâ€™ve read a pretty good book (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&amp;tag=boxxet-20&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F1400051053%2Fref%3Dlpr_g_1%3Fn%3D507846%26s%3Dbooks%26v%3Dglance">Wordcraft</a>, by Alex Frankel); Iâ€™ve thought hard about them.</p>
<p>For tech companies, the big problem is, of course, <a href="http://www.misk.com/lookup.nihtml?search=bulk">URL availability</a> and it is an extreme limiting factor to naming. The naturally limited inventory and the squatters forces <a target="_blank" href="http://andrewwooldridge.com/myapps/webtwopointoh.html">unnatural names</a>. (If you are lucky and the URL for your preferred name is not taken, then it is likely that the trademark is open as well, but you can do a <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/">quick check on that</a>).Â Â Venture capitalist Fred Wilson has a <a target="_blank" href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2006/03/domain_name_ext.html">post about domain name extensions</a> that is worth reading.Â  Since my blog is named Seedround, I will disagree with his statement that a name is worth $25,000.</p>
<p>So what is the creative process for finding a name? Don&#8217;t really have one, sorry. This is one of those &#8220;lightning can strike anywhere&#8221; projects.</p>
<p>Dan and I named Milktruck while he was keeping me company while I was waiting for a train. I forgot how we can up with Biz360 (but that was a codename that stuck; or more accurately, nothing better was ever suggested). Boxxet was thought of late one night (while I was alone) after weeks and weeks going through hundreds of names. I had to force myself to walk away from the project several times just to regain energy.</p>
<p>Thereâ€™s no magic for me; lots of ideas (some awful, some great but unavailable, some good); lots of research; then a bit of testing with your inner circle (after all, why share bizarre names with too many people?).</p>
<ul>
<li>Can they say it?</li>
<li>Can they spell it?</li>
<li>Are they going to, more likely than not, remember it?</li>
</ul>
<p>Yes to all? Wow! Two of three? Take it.</p>
<p>Does it pass the ridiculous test? Then go. Of course, you can also not pass the ridiculous test and still do very well (see Yahoo and Google).</p>
<p>There will be people who love/hate/like/dislike/donâ€™t care about your name. You will not get agreement; you should not bother to get agreement.</p>
<p>I happen to like names that are descriptive or provoke the images I would like the company&#8217;s users/clients to see:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Milktruck: This was a â€œpushâ€ Web application. So Milktruck automatically brought you fresh stuff every day!</li>
<li><a href="http://biz360.com/">Biz360</a>: This was an analytic application that analyzed all the news that happened around your company and industry everyday. Biz360 gave you a 360 degree view of your business.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.boxxet.com/">Boxxet</a>: The image of the &#8220;best-of&#8221; is reflected in a &#8220;box set,&#8221; thus the name Boxxet. People who do not like the name right away will often come back and tell me that they later changed their mind.</li>
</ul>
<p>We went through a LOT of names before we hit Boxxet. Many were awful. Here are some (no snickering, please): Onrego, civicjam, thelotofus, LoveOrHateIt, TheWordFor, REcolon, InRegardTo, ThisIsSwell, RiffWire. I&#8217;ll leave it to you to figure them out (at one point or another, they all had some meaning to me).</p>
<p>You may ask: why not go through a naming firm for such an important branding move?Â  To that, I point to <a target="_blank" href="http://salon.com/media/col/shal/1999/11/30/naming/print.html">this article</a> that I first saw on <a href="/guy-kawasaki-great-resource-for-entrepeneurs">Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seedround.com/naming-boxxet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
