Putting Campaign Spending In A Clear Perspective
I am very metrics- and numbers-driven. Just wanted to share a quick article that put campaign spending into perspective. I think most Americans believe that campaign spending is completely out of control and wasteful. Portfolio Magazine has a terrific and short article about how the presidential campaign spending compares to ad spending by large companies.
- Wendy’s: $315M
- Marketing on Microsoft Vista: $500M
- Presidential Campaign Spending (both parties): $1B
- AT&T: $2.25B
- P&G: $3.3B

The author argues that campaign spending is a bargain:
Given the magnitude of the decision and the cost of any branding campaign, the election industry’s spending of a billion dollars (over a four-year period) hardly seems overblown—especially for candidates who race onto the field with little or no brand identity.
Just like that, a deeply entrenched belief has been shattered. It is a good day.
UPDATE:
In the comments, Dave notes that the Biz360 technology shows that Hillary and Obama each got $1B of media coverage in Jan alone (thanks Dave). It’s true, Tide does not get that kind of coverage.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment
But what about media coverage? AT&T may spend over twice as much but they are not the lead story on every newscast, magazine cover, and news website. According to Market360, in Jan 08 Clinton and Obama got almost $1 billion worth of media coverage each. So given the amount of exposure the candidates get, are they spending too much?
By Dave on 02.27.08 2:12 pm
the source of the funds is the problem. in case of att or mcdonalds, our product purchases fund the ads and the company only gets more by giving us what we want. the candidates, on the other hand, are primarily funded by lobbyists – not us – and therefore are at their service and not ours.
By Edward O'Meara on 12.16.08 7:28 pm
TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>